Valuation and Recommendation - Paper Products Ltd

For comments/feedback on the model , please email the author at kumar.saraogi@gmail.com

Paper Products Limited (PPL / The Company) - Recommend BUY
At current levels of Rs.77.40 per share, Paper Products Limited seems like a good buy to me. According to my model (attached), the DCF valuation ranges between Rs.91 and Rs.100 depending upon assumptions we make primarily about (a) Working Capital - Inventory, DPO, DSO, (2) CAPEX in FY2014 and 2015.

Since PPL is a dividend paying company, one may consider using DDM - Gordon Growth too but I find it unfair to value the company using this method as the company does not pay out a large part of its earnings as dividends. Further, the retained part of earnings are not all used to make investments in order to support on going activities or expansion to support the growth in revenue and sales. The company regularly invests in financial instruments like Mutual Funds and other schemes as well. I believe the DDM/Gordon Growth model should apply to those companies which have a long history of dividend pay outs, and the amount of dividend would be that part of earnings which is not used or retained to make investments for expansion or continuing operations to support revenue stream. In this case, PPL's valuation is at approximately Rs.27 per share which in my opinion is far below the fair value.

The company's shares may seem overvalued compared to its domestic peers but what we need to consider is that PPL has very little debt in its capital while all the other domestic players are highly leveraged with Essel Propack's Debt-to-Equity being above 1. PPL's EBITDA is a mammoth 171 times Interest Expenses as compared to Indian peers' and AMCOR's at below 8 times the same. Clearly there is less risk associated with PPL than there is with its Indian and international competitors.

RISKS:

Input Costs Escalation: In FY2010, input costs rose sharply due to hike in price of raw materials. Although most of the other materials were volatile within a narrow band, PET Films prices rose by more than 150% due to global shortage of supply following shut-down of few major suppliers' units, delay in capacity additions and diversion of thin films to higher value added thick films for electronics industry. Other key raw materials that saw sharp rise in price were inks, adhesives and solvents. 

Competition, Margins and Pricing power: In absence of long-term contracts with buyers, PPL seems to be on the disadvantageous side of the negotiation table. Adding to that, competition has been increasing with new players entering and capacity additions with existing ones. In such environment, escalation in raw materials prices and other inputs like fuel and energy costs may undermine margins and cash flows. 

Inflation: PPL primarily serves the food processing industry. Due to recent inflation especially in food prices, PPL's customers have become price conscious and initiated cost cuts in their packaging expenses by compromising on packaging quality as well as by putting pressures on packaging suppliers' margins. Additionally they had resorted to reverse auctions, hard negotiations using consultants. 

Regulatory risk / Plastic ban on Food Processing Industry

 

OPPORTUNITIES

India – Economy, infrastructure & Rise in organized retail:  Having been partially insulated from global meltdown, India saw a robust GDP growth of near 8% and is expected to see the same in the coming year. Economic Times - "When larger wheels in a machine start rotating, the smaller ones automatically gain momentum. The same is true of the Indian packaging sector too. Strong growth in sectors like fast moving consumer goods, pharmaceuticals, liquor, cosmetics etc. has had a positive rub off on the packaging industry. Growth in consumer goods and organized retailing mainly drives demand for packaging." -

  Growing in size of middle class population means shifting form traditional grocery shopping and buying habits at the corner grocery store to supermarkets and organized retail outlets. This adds potential to flexible packaging industry as packaging is and will be an important strategy of product placement on the shelves of such supermarkets and stores where customers walk around and try to judge the contents/product by their packaging and/or brand. It is the least we should remember that PPL's customers are some of the leading FMCG brands who occupy shelves at such supermarkets and stores. The FMCG brands are in general bullish on the scope India offers further through infrastructure development in rural areas and underdeveloped towns which means establishment and growth of organized retail in those areas in the coming decade.Government of India - Ministry of Food Processing's Vision 2015: Although we need to discuss the quantifiable benefits of this plan for PPL, at the first thought PPL should directly and indirectly benefit from this initiative subject to GOI's proper execution of this plan.  Under this scheme the Ministry aims to (a) Become the Food Factory of the World, (b) Triple the growth of Food processing industries, (c) Increase the value addition from 20% to 35%, (d) Increase contribution to the world's agri-business from 1.5% to 3%. Further research on the Vision-2015 plan and discussions with the IR/Management of such companies would give us insights into the quantifiable benefits to PPL which may be in the face of Tax exemptions, subsidies, export incentives (kick-backs), minimum pricing power/protection, raw material quotas and rebates, etc. 

STRATEGY AND OPERATIONS:

NASP (New Applications, Structures, Products and Processes): In the long run, moving more business to value added segments, Innovation and new products, exploring new markets are seen as critical to profitable growth. The company's endeavor to renew innovation program will continue to be the cornerstone of PPL's strategy. NASP initiatives which contributed to 27.2% of total 2010 sales would get added thrust in the current year and years to come. Organizational measures to further accelerate the NASP efforts are in place with the CEO directly overseeing the company's innovation programs and strategy. PPL has been expanding its supplier base for critical raw materials and introducing alternative materials for its products as part of the innovation drive. 

Operations: The Company is making efforts to optimize existing capacity utilization and add units to plants that expect growth in their products. They have seen success in measures to cut operating costs and overhead expenses. To enhance capacity utilization, they initiated de-bottlenecking in supply chain and inventory controls. However, efficient management of Working Capital (Inventory, Receivables and Payables) is critical for favorable valuation in the light of rising materials prices. The DCF Model seems highly sensitive to these assumptions/inputs and further discussion with management regarding this would be vital to arriving at the valuation with more accuracy. Further, the valuation is also highly dependent on the company's ability to preserve or dictate sales margins (Cost + Input or Fixed Price) and Raw materials purchase price in the short and medium terms via contracts or expanding supplier base

Charting The Biggest Structural Problem For US Banks, And What TheMarket Expects...

by Tyler Durden on 8/24/11


Sometimes the general public can get confused in attempting to explain the complexities and the inefficiency of the banking sector when one simple chart brings the message home. A chart like that comes from the latest "Eye on the Market" from JPM's Michael Cembalest, who compares total bank deposits ($8.4 trillion), or bank liabilities, and total bank loan (about $2 trillion less) assets, or sources of cash flows that are supposed to fund bank liabilities and generate retained earnings, while the bank performs credit, maturity and risk transformation: a bank's three key functions. As the chart below shows, perhaps the primary reason why the economy is in its current deplorable state, is that instead of lending dollar for dollar to catch up with deposit growth, banks now rely on roughly $1.7 trillion in excess reserves with the Fed, an amount roughly equal to the difference between total deposits and loans, to plug the credibility gap. This also explains why according to Cembalest one of the expectations by the market from Jackson Hole is that IOER will be cut to 0% to promote bank lending, and thus the conversion of reserves into loans (something which the inflationistas out there will tell you is a big risk to a sudden surge in out of control inflation). So how does the Fed's direct intervention in bank balance sheets look like? Here it is

Full article at

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/charting-biggest-structural-problem-us-banks-and-what-market-expects-jackson-hole-version-n1

Downside Hedge Fund Bets On S&P500 Highest Since 2008 | ZeroHedge

by Tyler Durden on 24/08/11


Who says hedge funds are ambivalent about the current market? As of last week, they have not been

more bearish on the S&P since

before Lehman. From SocGen: "Hedge funds have opened the biggest net short positions since early 2008, concentrated on the most liquid segment of the market, i.e. the S&P 500. Meanwhile, positioning on small caps hardly moved (slight increase in net shorts on the Russell 2000). Surprisingly, they actually stuck to their net long positions on Technology (Nasdaq)." As usual, the amusingly named "hedge" funds defy their purported nature (as in, to

hedge), and merely pursue momentum, and should be more appropriately called "career risk" funds as the only variable is doing precisely what everyone else is doing: remember - to get a bonus at the end of the year, you don't have to outrun the market, you just have to outrun the biggest institutional fool out there. "Hedge funds have closed their net short positions on 10-year Treasuries and strongly diminished their net shorts on the long end (30Y), as recession fears have crunched expectations for higher bond yields, and endorsed by the Fed's announcement that it will keep rates low until at least 2013." Hedge fund infatuation with metals continues: "Hedge funds' enthusiasm for gold and platinum remains strong, as indicated by the high net long positions on these metals. Meanwhile, net long positions on base metals (copper) have been strongly reduced. Net long positions on crude oil remain relatively stable, less impressed by the perceived recession threats." Expect to see numerous short covering sprees until the end of the year, even as the market continues it secular decline back to fair value somewhere around 400.

Full article at

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/downside-hedge-fund-bets-sp500-highest-2008

BD

Oil Price - the long term bet !!

Oil for me is black gold and sooner or later is going to run out of supply, which would then lead us either to cut consumption (or stop consumption) or look for alternative means of energy for running out cars (Solar/hydro energy? May be?). Here are few reasons why I think so.

Peak oil theory

People have argued it long and are still arguing whether the oil production has peaked in 2005-2006 and we are on the verge of consuming what is left only for few years. There are evidences of large water reservoirs getting disappeared in OPEC region especially Saudi Arabia, leading us to believe that OPEC is pumping water in the field to take out oil. This would in turn mean that OPEC is struggling hard to maintain the production growth.

Oil Budget Deficit or OPEC Quota

10 of the 12 countries in OPEC 12 are producing within there quota’s which were decided years ago (see latest Oil report of May 2010), now these are the countries where Oil is the only official business income for the government to balance the budget and most of these countries are ~70-80% dependent on it. This would make a case of arguing that it’s not really the quota’s which is limiting there production, its there I inherent capacity to produce which cannot be enhanced. Think of this as other way, why didn’t a country like Iran or Nigeria produce more when oil was near $140, which would have solved there problems of deficit for years to come.

Most of the oil rich countries now need a price of around $40-$50 at least to balance there budgets and many of them have a marginal cost of producing an additional barrel at $60-$70.

Is it Speculation or demand driven price rise

Well, some people have long argued that oil price is about 60% speculation, while other says it’s purely a demand supply driven case though there might be little bit impact due to financial transactions. However, CFTC has already argued long back about the case (see this report ) still we seem to have the same notion. I do agree that commodities are an alternative class of assets and prove to be a measure for diversification in this crisis; however that’s true for the entire commodity complex and not just for oil. The only way to take a long exposure of oil or to protect yourself through the adverse price movement (in case you are a consumer) is through futures. Also looking how India and china are growing and there demand numbers peaking, why do we have to blame the entire price rise to financial markets?

Oil Spill

Does it mean something for me? Am I concerned about the environment now? Well honestly, this Deepwater disaster in USA (GOM) caused headlines around the world estimating the loss to the environment, damage to life, etc but yet there are so many other countries where this happens on a regular basis yet no one notices the same. This is largely because all the new discoveries of oil are in unconventional places in countries which are politically unstable, and where oil is the backbone of the economy and big oil giants just bend the rules.

Nonetheless, this disaster might lead to renewed curbs on offshore oil drilling for the near term, which was removed not so long ago by the house due to increasing demand of oil. We can see the visible impact of this spill on the longer term prices of oil.